I’ve never been a big fan of attempting to compare
different players from different eras. But the way LeBron James of the Miami
Heat dominates his opponents has made me consider – is he the best basketballer
in history?
It’s true that he did not have instant success in the NBA
as he spent several largely unspectacular seasons as part of a largely
unspectacular Cleveland Cavaliers team. But since he headed south to Miami and
joined with Dwyane Wade and Chris Bosh, he’s upped the ante and is arguably the
best player in the world right now.
Which got me thinking – where would he be placed in the
all-time rankings?
Picture Magic Johnson on the drive. Larry Bird sinking
another unlikely three pointer. Wilt Chamberlain towering above all his contemporaries.
Kareem Abdul-Jabbar’s incomparable and undefendable (is there such a word??)
skyhook. Charles Barkley and Karl Malone bullying and intimidating their way to
the basket. Jerry West plying his trade for the Lakers for 15 years in the 60’s
and 70’s. Shaquille O’Neal at his peak being head and shoulders (literally)
above all others. His Lakers team-mate Kobe Bryant, who runs games like a
General commanding an army. Michael Jordan’s freakish ability to
single-handedly take games away from opponents, often in the dying seconds of a
playoff game. And as the saying goes, many, many more. The Clyde Drexlers. The
Robert Parishes. The Patrick Ewings. The Tim Duncans. The list is almost
inexhaustible. Not to mention the countless international players of note over
the years too.
So I’ve made a few cuts from my dream team. I’ve automatically
excluded players from the 60’s and 70’s (I’m allowed to – it’s my team) as I
don’t believe the level of competition in that era was anywhere near the
standard we’ve seen since the early to mid-80’s onwards. I’ve also excluded
internationals such as the legendary Hakeem Olajuwon and the behemoth (7 ft 6
in) Yao Ming.
After all that I’ve tried to end up with a top six;
Johnson, Bird, Abdul-Jabbar, Malone, O’Neal, Bryant, Jordan and James. Ok, it’s
a top eight – but how do you exclude anyone from that list?
From there I’ve tried to analyse weaknesses, and had to
get very, very picky. O’Neal couldn’t score from the free-throw line to save
his life, so he’s out. Larry Bird was a fantastic all-round player. He could
shoot from inside and out, he could defend and he stayed at the top with the
Celtics for a long time, which is no mean feat. But he was boring, so he’s
gone.
But I could go no further in terms of culling these
superstars, so I’m left with my starting five and one bench-warmer (not sure
who that would be); Magic Johnson, Kareem Abdul Jabbar, Karl Malone, Michael
Jordan, Kobe Bryant and Le Bron James. Therefore by default, I am saying that
Le Bron is in my top half-dozen players of all-time.
But is he the greatest of all-time? The answer is; I
don’t know. If he ends his career in the NBA having scored 38,000, 36,000 or
32,000 points like Abdul-Jabbar, Malone and Jordan respectively, then perhaps
the answer will be yes. If he wins six NBA championships like Abdul-Jabbar and
Jordan, then he could well be. If he ends up with over 10,000 assists to his
name just like Magic Johnson, then he’ll be right up there.
I think my conclusion is that perhaps one day he will be
remembered as the greatest. But certainly not yet. Still, he’s being mentioned
in the same breath as those other greats of the game of basketball, and that’s
a pretty good start.
What the…
…hell has happened to rugby? I know this is a vast
generalisation but rugby is in danger of becoming boring. One series of
incidents in the Super 15 game between the Chiefs and the Crusaders on Friday
night summed it up for me.
In the first half a(nother) scrum was reset multiple
times before eventually collapsing. Wyatt Crockett, who is surely the worst
scrummager to have played at international level since, well, every single
Wallaby prop ever, simply couldn't cope with the bulk and strength of the
Chiefs’ Ben Tameifuna and ended up facing back towards his own locks. Referee
Steve Walsh in his infinite wisdom somehow decided that the prop now facing
backwards hadn't actually caused the collapse and penalised a disbelieving Tameifuna.
The problems highlighted by this situation are 1) complicated
rules that result in long periods of inactivity (usually resets or penalties), and
2) the nature of the rules that so often result in horrendously poor refereeing
interpretations (it was the Chiefs put-in to the scrum so why would they
collapse?), especially in scrummaging situations.
An old friend of mine who used to play international and
Super Rugby once told me that on some occasions he would know who had collapsed
the scrum. But he said in most instances the front-rowers themselves don’t know
why the scrummagers’ faces hit the turf. I’m no scientist; in fact I hated the
subject at school. But even I know that when two opposing forces, each weighing
800-900kg, collide the resultant movement due to the collision will
occasionally be downward.
Refs – just get the opposing players close to one another
before the hit and let them get on with it. If you absolutely believe one
player has deliberately collapsed the scrum (it’s usually the Australian prop
by the way), then by all means give the pea in the whistle some exercise. But
if there’s a hint of doubt in your mind, just reset the scrum and get the game
going again. I’ve loved rugby since I was a wee fella. But the rulebook has
become so lengthy and so complicated, and yet it leaves so much open to the
referee’s interpretation. The result is a game that struggles for continuity
and, once in a while, now struggles to hold my attention.
Progress?
We’re a fairly small nation in most ways, and that also
stretches to our cricketing exploits. But the New Zealand cricket team has a
proud history of punching above its weight and, but for a certain Inzamam Ul-Haq of Pakistan and an untimely injury to Martin Crowe, we would’ve probably
won the one-day world cup in 1992.
NZC should have built upon that near-success. But instead
we’ve endured years and years and years of underachievement and generally
disappointing performances. There’ve been some fabulous times mixed in with
that, and just a very few short years ago, our world rankings in all forms of
the sport were very impressive and seemingly on the rise.
But a quick glimpse of the ICC rankings now makes one
quietly fold up one’s replica Beige Brigade shirt and place it at the bottom of
the pile in the short-sleeved, sports only shirts drawer. In the test rankings
we’re second to last, comfortably out-performing that giant of the world game,
Bangladesh. In the one-dayers and T-20 ranks, we’re way behind all the proper
teams and only have Bangladesh, Zimbabwe, Ireland, Netherlands and Kenya below
us. Thank god Afghanistan, Scotland and Canada haven’t played enough matches to
be ranked…
Our rankings, and performances, had been slipping for a
while, so last year in came new coach Mike Hesson. Have things improved? No.
Why? Because we still can’t bat. Most, although certainly not all, of the
batsmen have the technical expertise to perform. But nothing seems to have
changed mentally. Last week’s second innings capitulation in the first test
against England at Lords, when chasing a very achievable winning target, was
embarrassing.
But what was more embarrassing were the shot selections
at crucial moments. A flashy cover drive on the up at 21-3 (how about all that
cricketing terminology in one sentence!). Getting caught on the boundary when
the team were 40-odd for 4. Attempting a T20-style lofted straight drive (and
missing the ball by several centimetres as the stumps are demolished) at 61-7.
What was even more embarrassing were Mike Hesson and
Brendon McCullum’s seemingly rehearsed responses to media after the test. They
raved about the fantastic and positive way the batsmen had just played. It
wasn’t fantastic; it was silly and irresponsible. Why not just see off the new
ball, knuckle down and actually attempt to grind out a win? That’s what all the
teams ranked above us would have done.
WooHoo-rriors
What a difference a week makes. Last week, I lamented a
Warriors team that simply seemed to give up as they slumped to their worst-ever
defeat. Also last week the Newcastle Knights destroyed the Canterbury Bulldogs.
Warriors Coach Matt Elliott fronted the media on numerous occasions this week
(and lost his cool with journalists a couple of times) and he promised issues
were being dealt with.
This week the writing was seemingly on the wall as the
Knights travelled to Mount Smart. Except somebody forgot to tell the Warriors
they were supposed to lose. It wasn’t a flawless performance by any means, but man
what an improvement from last week. A 28-12 win was absolutely deserved.
The best aspect of the win for me was their determination
and will to win that was so obviously absent last week. Matt Elliott did a
fantastic job turning the ship around in just a week. The Warriors need to
ensure he sticks around for a while yet. Let’s hope there are more performances
like that to come.
Cheers,
SG